The Clinton v. Spencer Race Gets Ugly--Literally
Sen. Hillary Clinton's Republican challenger, John Spencer, is denying a report that he described the former First Lady and current Senator from New York as "ugly" and implying that she's had cosmetic plastic surgery to improver her looks.
"It's a fabrication. I would never call Hillary Clinton ugly," Spencer told The Associated Press. "That's outrageous. I didn't do it."
Clinton, who turns 59 this week, hasn't commented but her adviser Howard Wolfson said she has had no plastic surgery or similar appearance-enhancing work.
Spencer was quoted in the Daily News saying, "You ever see a picture of her back then? Whew. I don't know why Bill married her."
I can't imagine why anyone would say a thing like that.
Advertisement
Comments
That picture is awesome! This reminds me of one of my favorite punk band names - "I'd Fuck Chelsea".
Posted by: JML | October 23, 2006 11:53 AM
I know I'm probably just beating someone to the punch on this (as it's an obvious question), but why is it that whenever a politican's looks comes up, it usually is in reference to a female politican? Fuck, if looks were a deciding factor in who got elected, there wouldn't be anyone left in the House and Senate Offices but the interns and pages (What, too soon?)
I mean, look at this guy and tell me there's not a double-standard for women in positions of power in this country:
http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2006/10/15/PH2006101501176.jpg
Sexy!
Posted by: steve-o | October 24, 2006 3:59 PM
Ethics aside, Denny Hastert is a hot piece of ass.
Posted by: Derek Phillips | October 24, 2006 4:24 PM
I'd hit it.
Posted by: Jake | October 24, 2006 4:39 PM
mmm-BOP!
Posted by: barabajagal | October 27, 2006 3:04 PM
His face almost looks like it was Photoshopped in. He's hardly changed at all! (Nice '70s outfits, btw)
Posted by: Robert Williams | March 22, 2011 11:07 AM